Damage Prevention -- Advice from an Expert

by Freda Parker
February 1, 2008

Non-Traditional Coastal Construction Practices

Dennis A. Quan currently works as Benefit Cost Analyst/Engineer with James Lee Witt Associates, the emergency preparedness and management experts of GlobalOptions Group. His past positions include Emergency Manager with the State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management and Hazard Mitigation Engineer/Officer with FEMA. That experience has prompted Mr. Quan to complete a thought-provoking report.

Titled Non-Traditional Coastal Construction Practices, this study is based on Mr. Quan's more than thirty-five years of experience as a disaster scientist/consultant. But it really zeroes in on more recent natural disasters -- Hurricanes Dennis, Katrina and Rita.

Mr. Quan says that the natural disasters of 2004 and 2005 created "widespread destruction of residential and commercial buildings" and a necessity for rebuilding. He suggests that we not rebuild in the same old way. Instead, we could use this as an opportunity to begin building differently and replacing what was lost with private and public structures that have the ability to weather future destructive events.

Higher-Hurricane Building Code Standards

In a special section discussing building codes, Mr. Quan writes, "After major events such as Hurricanes Andrew, Camille, Charley, Frances, Hugo, Ivan, some areas were able to enact more-stringent building-code standards. In an ideal world, at the minimum, hurricane standards should be based on the American Society of Civil Engineer's (ASCE) 7-1998 standards."

Unfortunately, building codes often meet only minimum standards and fall short of the ASCE recommendations, yet that is preferable to no codes.

But here's the good news! We don't have to stick with inadequate standards.

"Building codes may not and do not restrict people from building stronger," Mr. Quan states.

Alternative Construction Styles

According to Mr. Quan, his "report provides information for homeowners, business owners and local officials to make informed decisions about building practices, specifically targeting improvements and/or performance enhancing characteristics for areas subject to severe flooding and hurricane-strength wind forces in coastal environments."

For that purpose, he reviews several construction techniques, including their benefits and limitations.

He opens the section titled, "Alternative Construction Styles" with a discussion of Monolithic Domes and cautions that a Monolithic Dome "should not be confused with the many domes often used for major league sporting events, such as the New Orleans Superdome. The latter is an example of a conventional metal building, regardless of its outer covering/sheeting."

He also points out that "Concrete structures (such as Monolithic Domes) have to be built with a much larger margin of safety. It's not unusual to use a 20% safety margin on a steel building ... and a 500% margin on a monolithic-dome structure."

Note: To read or download Non-Traditional Coastal Construction Practices, click here.

Related Articles

• FEMA Reviews Hurricane Damage at New Life Family Church
• New Life Family Church: Now the second tallest building in Biloxi
• Maranatha Church Members Call Hurricane Rita "Eerie"
• Dupont and Katrina: The Category 5 Dome
• Dome of a Home and Katrina
• Preparedness Takes Preparation
• Tsunamis -- Rebuilding Better After Disaster
• Why Build A Concrete Dome?-- by Dr. Arnold Wilson
• Building Survivability
• Hazard Amnesia
• The Monolithic Dome -- Informational DVD or VHS

177 Dome Park Place - Italy, TX 76651
Tel (972)483-7423 - Fax (972)483-6662
| Press Room